Budget update: Nov. 1
November 1, 2019
— by Dan White, chancellor
This week your leadership team spent time on high-level budget planning for FY21.
While we are still waiting for the full FY21 budget distribution plan and guidance
from the president, we are preparing to begin the public discussion of our budget
at our annual open forum on budget on Nov. 21.
Per the compact between the Board of Regents (BOR) and governor, it is our expectation
that the BOR will submit a reduced budget ($25 million less than FY20) to the governor
with the additional need for internal reallocations to fund market increases, fixed
cost increases, and strategic initiatives of the BOR. This budget is on the agenda
for approval at the Nov. 8 Board meeting. Additionally, since the FY20 budget came
to us so late in the year, we are using a mixture of vertical cuts, horizontal cuts,
and one-time savings to bridge the present budget gap. As such, in FY21 we will be
making adjustments that reflect both base cuts avoided in FY20 and the anticipated
FY21 decrement. Of course, there are many unknowns at this point as the state’s budget
process has not begun.
As we start to think about meeting the FY21 budget, a number of reviews and strategies
will need to be involved. One suggestion that I forwarded several months ago was to
grow the shared services models that were organically begun at ÓÐÁϺÐ×ÓÊÓƵ some years ago.
We can benefit from this strategy more broadly as a way to provide service and preserve
expertise. The best practices developed to date in a variety of grassroots shared
service models across ÓÐÁϺÐ×ÓÊÓƵ that can now inform a more expanded approach.
Expedited academic program review planning is already underway. I’ve been asked whether
we have a target in mind for savings to be realized from these reviews, and the short
answer to that is no. The primary purpose of program reviews is to evaluate the quality
of our programs, their effectiveness, efficiency, and their alignment with ÓÐÁϺÐ×ÓÊÓƵ’s mission.
While the results of the reviews will clearly inform decisions that must be made to
play a role in our current budget, we’re not asking the review committees to recommend
cuts to reach a specific dollar amount. It’s also important to keep in mind that any
savings that may result are not immediate or short-term in nature.
In parallel with the academic program reviews, I will be working with Faculty Senate
on a process for review of ÓÐÁϺÐ×ÓÊÓƵ administration. Like the academic reviews, this review
will not be working towards a specific reduction target. I anticipate Faculty Senate
will work with Staff Council and ASÓÐÁϺÐ×ÓÊÓƵ student government on proposing/recommending
a process to me and in helping to populate the team conducting the administrative
review. Since administration supports academics and research, we will want to consider
the administrative support needed in the context of recent changes and forecasted
needs. I look forward to this review.
As always, we will be evaluating what we are doing in a time when resources are constrained,
and what we might need to stop doing. Where possible, I continue to implement vertical
reductions and further reduce our facility footprint, operations and maintenance costs,
and deferred maintenance bills. And while there are many unknowns, reviews to occur,
and discussions and deliberations yet to be had, unit leaders are anxious to start
their budget thinking for next year. So that this can occur, I have recommended to
vice chancellors to begin their preliminary thinking around a 15 percent reduction
to unrestricted general fund support in FY21. Obviously, that is just an early estimate
of the need for reductions at the unit level at this stage in the process.
I have asked Provost Prakash and VC Queen, co-chairs of the Planning and Budget Committee
(PBC) to initiate meetings to evaluate the current plans, recommendations, and unexplored
ideas to meet the FY21 budget target. Though it may feel early at this stage, I have
also asked Provost Prakash to start the process of soliciting FY22 strategic initiative
proposals for review by the PBC.
Please keep sharing your good thinking.
Thank you for choosing ÓÐÁϺÐ×ÓÊÓƵ.